Reverend
and dear brother Bishops, I come before you as a fellow pastor to share with
you in the words of the prophet Jeremiah “the injury of my people.” I
want to thank you for your solidarity and your generosity towards our Church
of Jerusalem. You are a Church which cares for the Christians of the Holy
Land and for the future of Jerusalem. You continue to give an example of how
to act as Church in response to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
In
my ministry, I have taken to heart the affirmation of the Second Vatican
Council that the Church “has the right to pass moral judgments, even on
matters touching the political order.” (GS 76)
I have attempted to be faithful to the mandate of the Council that
bishops address “grave public problems,” including “questions of war
and peace and brotherly relations among all people.”
I have attempted always to teach on these matters in fidelity to the
gospel, to Catholic social teaching, and to the law of love. I owe your
conference a debt of gratitude for supporting positions we patriarchs and
heads of churches of Jerusalem have taken and for supporting our right and
duty to speak out. You have been true brothers.
(1) The Current Situation
I
want to share the pain and frustration of those I serve. Their voices are
often not heard in this country. In the words of Jeremiah,
“‘Peace, peace,’ they say, but there is no peace.” (Jer. 6:14)
1.1 We in the
Holy Land are living through the most difficult period of a century-long
conflict between two peoples. To Christians, the violence of the present
crisis represents an exacting test of faith. “If we are true believers in
God,” we must “ponder how
our freedom, our political freedom, relate(s) to the word of God, who says
that love must be the guide of man in the worst and darkest of
circumstances.” (Homily, St. Etienne, Oct. 12, 2000)
Violence is
unacceptable as a means to resolve conflicts.
Israeli’s and Palestinians alike should understand this. I mourn
all victims, Palestinians and Israelis, Christians, Muslims and Jews. I am
particularly saddened for the death of children and young on both sides,
Israelis and Palestinians.
The mandate of
the gospel is clear: we must be peacemakers, hunger and thirst for justice,
love our enemies, and pray for those who persecute us. At the same time, the
Second Vatican Council calls us to defend the rights of the innocent and “to
renounce the use of violence.”(GS, 77) Thus even as the patriarchs of
Jerusalem have affirmed that “it is the right and the duty of an occupied
people to struggle against injustice in order to gain their freedom,” we
also professed our conviction that “non-violent means remain stronger and
more efficient” as well as morally superior.
(Patriarchs, Nov. 2000)
1.2. Despite
our hopes, these last eight months have been marked by swelling waves of
violence. From the Palestinian side, violence is manifested in stone
throwing, gun shooting, mortar fire and suicide bombings against civilians.
On the Israeli
side, violence has taken many other forms: sealing of Palestinian towns and
villages, ploughing under of agricultural fields, cutting down of olive
groves, bulldozing of houses, indiscriminate shelling and bombing of
civilians, and protection of settlers who themselves use violence.
The recent
violence is only the visible aspect of the Palestinian-Israeli struggle. The
media and the politicians try to reduce the conflict to various
manifestations of violence, as if quelling the violence is sufficient to
resolve the underlying problem. We repudiate violence. But we must
understand that violence has a cause and the most effective way to
remove the violence is to address the cause.
That cause is Israeli occupation of Palestinian land.
The state of
Israel today includes 78% of historic Palestine.
In 1967 Israel occupied the rest of Palestine, the remaining 22% of
what had been Palestine before the establishment of Israel. Since the early
1990s, the Palestinians and much of the Arab world recognized the legitimacy
of the state of Israel. In so doing, the Palestinians have already conceded
78% of the land as Israel’s. Palestinians now claim the remaining
territory as their rightful homeland. They have been supported in this by
United Nations resolutions calling for the exchange of land for peace.
Many say that
late last year something close to the full transfer of territory might have
been achieved. Meanwhile, Israeli annexations, confiscations,
settlement-building, by-pass road and security zone construction made the
establishment of a viable Palestinian state seem an impossible dream. These
actions built up an enormous reservoir of mistrust which burst forth in the
intifada. God willing, inshallah, the new cease-fire will make way
for genuine peace.
1.3. How shall
we escape from this situation? Israel’s
priority is security, and that security remains threatened by Palestinian
resistance. Security for Israel can come by dealing seriously with the
Palestinian claims for independence, not by force. The best protection for
Israel is the conversion of the Palestinian enemies of today into the
friends of tomorrow.
(2)
The Situation of Christians
2.1. I know you want to
hear about the condition of our Christian people. Let me tell you first how
they see themselves. The normal way Christian Palestinians see themselves a
part of their people, and they conceive of their future as one with their
people.. Hence they are a part of the conflict. They may be found among the
victims as among the survivors. They share in claiming their freedom and
their land. To treat Palestinian Christians as a purely religious community
without any legitimate national aspirations or distinct culture de-humanizes
them. In this matter, we take solace in Pope John Paul II’s teaching that
within a culture of peace national heritage plays an important part in
people’s moral development. (CA 51; see 50.)
In the last
eight months, Christian towns or villages (Bethlehem, Beit-Sahour,
Beit-Jala, Ramallah, Zababdeh) have been bombed. In December, our Latin
seminary and church in Beit Jala were shelled for three hours. In the
village of Aboud, lands have been confiscated and thousands of olive trees
cut. Only two days ago I was called by the parish priest to that village to
see more olive groves cut down by the army and settlers.
The sealing of
towns and villages has deprived people of employment and essential services.
Normal life is impossible. Lack of jobs for Christians as for all
Palestinians makes providing daily food a hard matter. Catholic agencies
(CRS, Pontifical Mission, Caritas, the Order of the Holy Sepulchre) are
doing their best to help.
The siege made
access quite difficult for the Patriarch, the Bishops, the parish priests.
The sealing affected the running of the schools and the transportation of
teachers and students. Economic instability has reduced the schools’
tuitions to the minimum, and has caused a deficit in the schools budget
which has created a need for new support for the schools which are the basis
of our pastoral action.
(3)
The Role of The Church in This Conflict
3.1.
The Holy Father has pleaded repeatedly for an end to the violence and a
return to respect for international law in this conflict, and he has
identified “contempt for international legality” as one of its causes.
The Church must make clear that the international community has played a
role in this conflict since its beginnings and so bears responsibility to
help in its resolution. The Church should also insist on compliance with
United Nations resolutions as the basis for any settlement of the
Israeli-Palestinian dispute. The international community should be
able to apply international law to this situation.
3.2
The Church should insist with all the means at its disposal on re-definition
of the conflict. The core of the question is the Israeli military occupation
and Palestinian claims for freedom and land, and the quest for peace for all
the people of the region.
3.3
Because justice for the Palestinians is essential to providing security to
Israel, collaboration of Catholic churches with Jewish communities for a new
shared vision of security for Israelis and justice for Palestinians is a
much-needed step. You in the United States, with your strong ties to the
Jewish community, have a special role to play here.
5.4
The Church must continue to advocate for the future of Jerusalem. The Church
ought not to overlook the political aspects of the question Jerusalem
remains at the center of Palestinian identity as it is of Israeli and Jewish
identity. Palestinian sovereignty over occupied East Jerusalem should be
recognized. Then shared sovereignty over one undivided city could be
discussed.
For
us the religious dimension of Jerusalem is vitally important. As the Holy See
has insisted, because of the unique holiness of the city a special
statute, to be forged by the local political authorities, is required, and
ought to be further supported by international guarantees. In addition, the
present Status Quo in the Holy Places should be respected without
modifications
3.5.
Finally, the Church needs to be active in resolution of the refugee question.
If Israel recognizes its responsibility and accepts the right of return in
principle, the modalities of return will be more easily discussed. In
addition, the international community must recognize its responsibility for
helping create the refugee problem and for helping resolve it peacefully.
In these days I
hope we shall find ways both to work together more effectively for a just
peace in the Holy Land and to act in decisive ways to secure the Christian
presence in the Holy Land. May God bless you all.
+ Michel Sabbah
Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem |