Olive Branch from Jerusalem

 

 
 

 


News, articles and documents from the Holy Land

Text Box: “Peace will be the fruit of Justice and my people will dwell in the beauty of Peace” (Isaiah 32:17)
 


Issue No. 171 - Saturday, 21 September 2002

Dear Friends, Brothers and Sisters,

The situation is extremely dangerous in Ramallah, especially around President Arafat’s residence which is almost turned into rubble since the last three days… At this moment, the Israeli army is giving everybody inside it, including Arafat, the last chance to go out before exploding everything on their heads. We cannot know what will happen in the next hours and days.

The problem is that all this is happening in front of the eyes of the world, and nobody dares to tell Israel “STOP”.. I am afraid really that the world became deaf and blind?!

I am not only concerned about the life of Arafat, but also about the lives of more than one million people in the big Palestinian town who are under curfew since more than three months, and especially since the last days they are under a strict curfew confining them all inside their houses, while the Israelis celebrated Rosh Ha-Shana (The new year) and Yom Kippour (feast of repentance and fasting) and will celebrate in the next days the feast of Shivo’ot (the seven days).. I don’t know what kind of celebration they have while they are oppressing and aggressing another people??!!

I really very angry and depressed in these days, because I don’t see any sign of hope or any slight light at the end of this long dark tunnel. We really feel helpless but never hopeless. Nevertheless, I still believe that more prophetic voices should rise again and again and say a word of truth in the face of the world. Therefore, I am still working for peace, with whoever form any side can help to make a difference in this ugly situation. I have already told you about the initiative of the Jewish Rabbis, Christians priests and pastors, Molsem and Druze Sheikhs who are working together in the frame of a newly born movement called “Clergymen for peace”. It is my pleasure, in this issue to send you the first common interfaith declaration which will be signed by a lot of clergymen from the different religions in the Holy Land. I hope that you will find it interesting and if anybody of you, especially clergy would like to sign it and add his name, I will be more than happy if you send me that by e-mail so that we publish it within the next month with all the signatures.

You will find in today’s Olive Branch the following documents:

1)      To begin, a very short but beautiful “prayer for peace” written by the World Conference on Religions and Peace.

2)      The “INTERFAITH DECLARATION” written by the “Clergymen for Peace”.

3)      Statement Arab Educational Institute in Bethlehem, concerning the Iraqi question and the current situation in Ramallah and in all the other Palestinian towns.

4)      Dr. Bernard Sabella is sharing with us “Just Some Thoughts” but worthy to be read.

5)    Dr. Harry Hagopian shares with us his one-page article 'Future Forecasts?'. It too seeks peace and advocates against violence.

I hope that these heavy days will run away soon, because, the situation in the Holy Land is becoming unbearable for both sides. We need and immediate International intervention!

With my best wishes from Taybeh                            Fr. Raed Abusahlia

Prayer for Peace

Heal my wounded heart.
Grant me the courage to change my heart.
Let Peace live in my heart.

Fill me with compassion for those suffering in war.
Help me care for those in war.
Help me bring Peace to those in war.

Help me stop wars.
Help soldiers stop wars.
Help leaders stop wars.

Fill me with Peace and Justice.
Help me to work for Peace with Justice.
Let there be Peace with Justice among all peoples.

This Prayer for Peace is attributable to the World Conference on Religions and Peace, and celebrates the UN International Day of Peace. The event, taking place on 21 September 2002, is a day of global ceasefire and non-violence. There are activities scheduled in 62 countries world-wide that are meant to promote a culture of peace and non-violence.

INTERFAITH DECLARATION

Clergymen for Peace

 

We, Jewish, Christian, Druze and Muslim religious leaders cry out in the name of our One God, to recognize one another, children of Abraham, as created in God’s image.

 

The forces of demonization and hate have taken hold not only in the Middle East but throughout the globe, and we must look into our religious traditions and speak out in the name of compassion and justice.


Our task as religious leaders is to engage our own people in self reflection and point the way to a better future for our children and ourselves.

We, therefore, out of our respective religious traditions:

* Condemn all acts of violence and human rights violations, seeing as they contradict God's will for humanity. The suffering of Israelis and Palestinians must stop.  An attack against any human being is an attack against God.

 

* Call upon Israelis and Palestinians to recognize each other's humanity, deep roots in this land and suffering. We must find the courage to break the cycle of violence and human rights violations.  Each act of violence being committed by either side elicits further violence.


* Call for energizing the vision of peace through negotiations, based on international legitimacy and respect for international law and the shared ethics of our religious traditions, thus fulfilling the national aspirations of two peoples and ensuring the human right to live free from occupation and fear.


* Draw from the wisdom of our faiths to accept the particularity of each of our traditions while respecting one’s right to be different. Our Houses of worship must remain open and unharmed. Any desecration of our sanctuaries is a desecration of God’s presence in this world. Even more important than those sanctuaries built of stone are the sanctuaries which God has implanted within each and every human being.

 

* Agree to act as a living bridge between despair and hope and re-ignite the peace process, acting as mediators where possible and as agents of faith and instruments of love where it seems impossible. We will collectively and individually employ all of our influence in every conceivable way to realize a vision which goes beyond the cessation of hostilities and looks forward to the day when our peoples will be a mutual blessing to each other. We will meet among ourselves and engage our peoples and leaders.


In the name of God Who is compassionate and just, in the Name of God Who hears the cries of all those who suffer, in the name of God Who demands that we pursue justice through just means and seek peace by actively pursuing it, we call on the peoples and leaders of the Middle East and the world to act at once.

 

Statement Arab Educational Institute

Bethlehem, 17 September 2002

Dear friends,

 

We would like to address you for some matters of urgency. The Palestinians denounce, and pray for the prevention of, an American-led attack on Iraq not just because it could put the Iraqi region in flame but also for its potentially devastating consequences for the situation on the ground in the West Bank and Gaza. When one follows Israel’s internal debates, it is alarming to hear all the pundits’ talk about the various local military options that could take place in the wake of such an attack. Many of the publicly debated scenarios take into account a possible ‘transfer’ of the Palestinian population out of the West Bank. It looks as if Palestinians are considered non-beings to be dispensed with at will. For some time now, polls in Israel indicate that some 50% of its (Jewish) population look favourable at what boils down to a policy of ethnic cleansing. There are even posters circulating on a wide scale in Israel promoting the idea. The Israeli political leadership and civil society should be made very clear that in the 21th century, in a century supposedly devoted to “a culture of peace,” mass expulsion is not an option suitable for public sloganizing or pondering.

 

That Palestinians are treated as non-beings also applies to two other issues which we would like to raise. First, the educational situation. The major problem Palestinian families now face are the continuous difficulties of access to schools due to the Israeli occupation, including roadblocks, curfews and closures. For many, the poverty as a result of the closures takes its toll. In several regions is a shortage of food and medical care and many families cannot provide for their children’s school needs, such as school materials and uniforms. It is a Herculian task for schools and the Palestinian Ministry of Education to provide elementary road protection to students, and to reinstall a healthy and appropriate school environment. This requires among other things taking measures to repair the recent damage inflicted on school buildings and properties and to build new school classes so as to allow all children to attend school and reduce the double shifts.

 

Policy making in the educational field is not just a challenge, it is often simply impossible. There is at present no physical contact possible between educational authorities because Ramallah, the headquarters of the Ministry of Education, is still closed and inaccessible. Many Palestinian cities are these days under strict curfew. In the Bethlehem area, the Ministry informs us that due to the difficulties of traveling between Bethlehem town and the villages still 30 teaching posts have yet to be filled. As AEI we again would like to urge you to raise attention and publicity to this issue in your home country. Extensive psychological and educational damage is inflicted upon a future Palestinian generation.

 

On top of that, the Israeli government (its inner security cabinet) has announced plans to annex the airport area between Jerusalem and Ramallah, and the Rachel’s Tomb area in Bethlehem. It seems that they want to make serious work of building “metropolitan Jerusalem,” the heart-felt wish of the present right-wing major of Jerusalem, Ehud Olmert. Jerusalem’s borders would be extended to cover a large area deep inside Bethlehem’s urban center. Not just Rachel’s Tomb would be annexed (a site, incidentally, holy to Jews as well as Christians and Moslems), but also the surrounding area of the Bilal bin Rabah mosque and cemetery to the west of the site, and a large area to the east, up to Caritas Hospital. This all would be confiscated for so-called security reasons and in order to construct a new road to the Tomb only accessible for Israelis. A population of possibly not less than 3000 Palestinians, who live in the urban heart of Bethlehem, are thus brought under Jerusalem jurisdiction by a stroke of the pen. (We have to wait to see what will be those people’s real fate; that is, whether they can stay to live there, since we know that the Jerusalem municipality is not eager to bring Palestinians under its civil authority).

 

If Jerusalem will be open at all, Palestinians from the southern West Bank will only be able to travel to that city by making a large detour inside Bethlehem. The Bethlehem-Jerusalem checkpoint would be located several hundred meters south to the present one, again inside the urban center of Bethlehem. It is obvious that the new bypass-road and checkpoint grid will serve to make it more difficult for tourists to visit Bethlehem. The plan thus seems part of a policy to further marginalize Bethlehem as a tourist and economic center; to prevent the city’s natural growth, and ro make life conditions for young and old so difficult that they will leave the country. It is no exaggeration to say that this Jerusalem metropolitan policy, if pursued and realized, will be the death blow for any future viable Bethlehem community.

 

Again, we urge you to take this matter seriously. As an editorial of the Israeli newspaper Haaretz commented, this is nothing else than land grabbing and a slap in the face of any peace initiative that might now take place in the wake of the recent lull in suicide bombings and the determination of the Palestinian Legislative Council to institute reforms within the PNA structures. We in particular appreciate any initiative from abroad to protest this plan within circles of Jewish religious leaders. They are to no small extent responsible for the persistent pressure over the years on Israel’s political leadership to keep the Rachel’s Tomb area in Israeli hands.

 

In sum, we do an appeal to all our peace-loving friends in the world to raise their voice against these serious developments, so as to help preserving regional peace, preventing a further deterioration on the ground, and ending the Israeli occupation.

 

Arab Educational Institute

AEI is a community education institute operative in the Bethlehem-Hebron area of Palestine. It is affiliated to Pax Christi International and to the Euro-Arab Dialogue from Below (IKV, The Netherlands)

 

P.O.Box 681 Bethlehem - West Bank - Palestine

Tel. (+ 972-)2-274.4030  Fax: (+ 972-)2-277.7554

Email office: aei@p-ol.com

 

Just Some Thoughts

Dr. Bernard Sabella

 

My wife and daughter were watching Ghostbusters on MBC Television on the Thursday afternoon of the tragic bus bombing in Tel Aviv. As I was engaged in working on my computer, my wife told me that "they had entered the President's residence." Instinctively I answered the Ghostbusters went to the White House!? She had to explain to me that she was referring to a breaking news caption that speaks of Israeli tanks and other military vehicles entering once again the compound of President Arafat's Headquarters.

 

This latest Israeli incursion onto Arafat's quarters left me without emotion, I was not angry nor did I rush to hear the news; on the contrary, I continued on with what I was doing on the computer.  

 

Perhaps the absence of emotion, on my part, was due to the fact that I am falling behind on my analytical skills of Israeli government statements and behavior. Not that I was ever a good analyst but at least I used to labor to discover the logic behind the actions of the Israeli government. Now I am convinced that there is no logic whatsoever and this is indeed a mortal blow to my analytical skills.

 

I do not regret it, however, because this means that another potential stressing factor in my life has forever disappeared and I could hopefully use my energies elsewhere.

 

But what made me emotional was a statement that Ha'aretz English attributed to Michael Kleiner Israeli Member of the Knesset from the extreme right wing Herut (Freedom) Party on how to proceed on the aftermath of the bus bombing of Thursday, September 19th. Allow me to quote the statement as it appeared in Ha'aretz English on Friday, September 20th:

 

"MK Michael Kleiner, who constitutes the one-man opposition Herut faction, said that if Prime Minister Ariel Sharon did not begin aerial bombing raids on Palestinian towns, he must call new elections. He said the government should warn the Palestinians of impending bombings and leave the borders open for them to flee to Jordan."

 

Simply put how could anyone, including Mr. Kleiner himself, make such a statement? In the midst of conflict and violence, that saw also the killing of 75 Palestinians during the "quiet" forty-day period prior to the Thursday bus bombing, the search should be to find ways to stop once and for all the hostilities and acts of violence, irrespective of perpetrator/s. The message that violence, of any manner, could provide a way out is only used by people who do not want to labor to find a solution acceptable to both peoples.

 

Violence not only hurts, kills and traumatizes the people who experience it, on whatever side they are; it hurts all of us as it leaves scars deep inside each and everyone of us, irrespective of being an Arab or a Jew. So once again the question of leadership on all sides is posed. We need leaderships that would help us find a way out of violence and out of our hurt. We need leaderships that have an agenda for healing and not for bombing. Israeli politicians need to turn inward and examine whether there is any slight chance that such a leadership would emerge in Israel? "And why do you look at the speck in your brother's eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye?" (Matthew 7:3)

 

Or perhaps I am an idealist to ask for such a leadership in Israel and elsewhere in our Middle Eastern context!?

 

Dr. Bernard Sabella

Executive Secretary

Department of Service to Palestinian Refugees

Middle East Council of Churches Jerusalem 

 

Future Forecasts?

Dr Harry Hagopian, KSL-KOG

 

Having come in late, my colleague Anthony and I had to take our seats at one corner away from the conference table. In fact, I had never seen the room quite so full in all the years I have attended on and off the meetings of the Middle East Forum for ‘Churches Together for Britain and Ireland’. This was certainly a capacity crowd, and the reason for this keen interest by representatives from so many different churches in the UK was largely due to the main guest speaker. Reverend Naim Ateek, a Palestinian Christian who is also the director of the Jerusalem-based Sabeel Ecumenical Liberation Theology Centre, had been invited by the forum to provide an update on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

 

I had known this affable man for a number of years, and had always been struck by his honesty and integrity as much as by his faithful concern for the indigenous Christians of the Holy Land. I had also been quite influenced by his inclusive and scriptural interpretation of the ‘neighbour’ - whether that neighbour was the next-door Palestinian Muslim or the Israeli Jew in the cities and towns within Israel. If anyone could contextualise the situation, this was the man.

 

Reverend Naim Ateek started off with a warning that his views might startle some people! Indeed, both the tenor and tempo of his assessment were not too far from being apocalyptic - something he admitted that many Palestinians shared today. He indicated that the levels of despair within the Palestinian community were so high that many people thought the only solution to this conflict lay in divine intervention. To date, I had not heard any warning in such chilling terms. 

 

Ateek then went on to outline the three methods by which Israel was controlling the Palestinians. Segmentation and fragmentation came first whereby Palestinian lands were being segmented by settlements and fragmented with by-pass roads. Although the settlements take up 2% of Palestinian aggregate land, the by-pass roads now control 17% of this same territory. The second method was the co-optation of certain informers from within the Palestinian community so that Israel kept the upper hand in terms of intelligence feedback and compliancy with its wishes. The third method fostered economic dependence so that the Palestinian economy - and thereby survival - depended upon Israel alone.

 

According to ‘Assis Naim’ (as he is known in Jerusalem), this erstwhile system of subtle controls by Israel has now yielded to a system of unrestrained suppression. In his view, this is being done in an intentional and structured manner through the provocation and harassment of Palestinians by the Israeli army as much as the wholesale humiliation of a nation. Such measures are inexorably leading to the gradual and deliberate dehumanisation of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza. According to the Israeli B’Tselem human rights organisation, 70 Palestinians have died at checkpoints, 39 women have given birth at checkpoints, and 15 ambulance drivers have been killed.

 

Assis Naim also cited different writers and analysts to unfurl what he considered to be the Israeli strategy in the Palestinian occupied territories. Referring to the policy of closures, targeted assassinations of the Palestinian political leadership and expansion of settlements, he suggested that the primary Israeli focus today was the massive expulsion and staged transfer of Palestinians from their homes. He believed that a war with Iraq and an unstable Middle Eastern region could provide Israel with an ideal cover for presenting itself as a country under siege, and encourage it to use self-defence to tighten up its strategy of a creeping transfer of Palestinians out of their homes and birthplaces.

 

Naim Ateek concluded by reminding his audience of the perils now facing all Palestinians - Christians and Muslims alike - and the need to stave off an impending ‘genocide’ or ‘apocalypse’. He gave the example of posters that have crept up in different neighbourhoods of Jerusalem stating in Hebrew that the transfer of Palestinians [to next-door Jordan] is the only means of heralding peace and security for Israelis. He indicated that this option is now being openly debated within a large cross-section of the Israeli Jewish populace, and he linked these posters with the Torah [the first five books of the Bible] where it says that the way to deal with indigenous people is either to expel or destroy them.

 

Having served as political consultant and ecumenical facilitator to the Churches of the Holy Land during the Oslo years, I was deeply perturbed by this critical degree of political corrosion. And for someone who has been proactively - and at times stubbornly - working toward reconciliation between Jews, Muslims and Christians, I was also troubled by the painful ferocity and staggering bluntness of those new developments. After all, could they not threaten to destabilise a whole region and thereby eliminate the Palestinian reality by eliminating a large swathe of its people too?

 

Once the forum meeting was over, though, I realised that the speakers had ‘analysed’ the ever-worsening situation but had not adopted any practical ‘church-based’ plan of action. True, the factual mastication of symptomatic realities had been impressive, but nobody had managed to come up with a viable plan that engaged the future. Given the cruel on-the-ground realities for both sides, that is the real and just challenge today. But the silence was sadly deafening!

 

©   harry-bvH @ 20 September 2002

 

 

 

 

 

Important note to our dear readers

We really hope that you enjoy what we send you and find it useful. If you need further information, please feel free to contact us at: nonviolence@writeme.com 

  • But, you should keep in mind that this newsletter is not an official newsletter of the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem;
  • Only documents signed by the Patriarch himself, express an official position, but all other news items, articles and documents express the personal opinion of their respective authors;
  • I remain the only person responsible for the presentation and editorials in this newsletter, which is meant to be a simple instrument of information conveyance without pretensions;
  • We do not side with anybody, but with the truth. We only strive for human rights, justice, peace for everybody and work towards reconciliation with all.

Thank you for your understanding & with best wishes from Jerusalem        Fr. Raed Abusahlia